Martin Filo
student
Faculty of Architecture and Design STU in Bratislava
Slovakia
Architecture
Práca sa zaoberá problematikou vysokoškolského Campusu v Bratislave. Cieľom bolo celý areál patriaci univerzite STU zrevitalizovať, sprístupniť a otvoriť… more
Kris Jon Jay Aranilla
advisor
University of Perpetual Help System DALTA - Calamba
Filipino
Architecture turning the experience of having been as best as it can. Proper space planning,… more
The proposal of bringing back life to STU Campus in Bratislava shows a strong urban outlook which presents two contrasting approaches. First, the design reconnects the previously closed-in block with the wider fabric of the Old Town. 4 strongly defined points of entry and an east-west axis of activity re-opens access, provides vivid first impression and, most importantly, ample assembly space into which can flow the 6,900 students, faculty and staff who flock to the campus every day. The belt is further divided into a series of micro-environments, which will offer a pleasing combination of active and passive programmings, and a staircase envisaged as an inhabitable space traverse the sloping 3.6-metre step and will give the project an architectural flourish. Second, a persuasive blue-green infrastructure plan transforms rainwater into a resource; the rain garden in the middle of the plan will be complemented by the roof-scape retention and evapotranspiration surfaces to complete the small water cycle and write off long-term resilience to climate changes.
Of equal convincing is the concern with the daily lives of students. The move of large labs into the campus core frees street-frontage space which may be devoted to cafeterias, study lounges and collaboration zones, and rooftop, or even sky-gardens, hint at an up-to-date third-place philosophy that brings learning outdoors. The responsibly selected materials, including large-format Renitbeton paving, WPC decking with low maintenance requirements and movable steel furniture, which already indicates the importance of durability in such high-traffic academic purpose. A high level of detailing, drainage and buildability is evident in 1 : 30 construction sections, an achievement perhaps unseen in master-plan resolutions.
Despite these four entrance plazas being well situated, to further alleviate the congestion in peak hours, as well as enhance orientation, they should be allocated a specific programme, or character. Pedestrian flow could be enhanced even further by the introduction of a complementary diagonal desire-line to the dormitory quarter. Universal-access continuity should be researched further: the exhibitors staircase is very captivating, but a nearby ramp or a hidden elevator would ensure that everyone can access it all year round, without fail, even in icy weather. When translated to the environmental dimension, the costing of possible runoff attenuation, and expected temperature decrease would convert the powerful sustainability story to a performance measure. The envelope of the new laboratory block should also be better articulated to prevent the too monolithic appearance and to overcome the acoustical issues that may arise at the crowded central belt.
Overall, the project is the epitome of campus thinking, the juxtaposition of civic openness and student intimacy, and together with crystal-clear spatial organization and functional ecological engineering. By honing the inclusiveness aspects, fine-tuning in environmental metering and architectural articulation of the new constructions, the project would both establish a precedent of the current European university city-making.
In an effort to promote the STU Campus revitalization project even further, a few viable improvements are proposed. To begin with, the four primary nodes of entrances are well situated, though providing them with individual identity or programmatic nature, i.e., making them a study plaza, performance space, or a local hub, would make them more legible and also distribute the activity within the site more equally. Another very important issue is the accessibility; the main residential stairway provides a very strong architectural statement and it must be complemented with an incorporated ramp or a lift that would provide the barrier free passage at least during winter time. Also, a diagonal pedestrian connection between the faculty buildings and the student housing or other such transportation hubs should be introduced and this would enhance the connectivity and address the natural line of desire.
Stormwater retention capacity, surface temperature reduction or irrigation savings performance metrics could be measured to help quantify the sustainability strategies of the project, especially the vegetative area of the roof and the rain garden. This would ensure that the ecological tale is anchored on quantifiable results. Furthermore, the new structures especially the laboratory block should be subjected to more articulation on face to eliminate monolithic expression and enhance environmental performance by providing shading, or textural effects by modular variation.
Introducing more year-round programming that is adaptable and seasonal (e.g. outdoors classrooms, art installations, or small scale events) into open spaces will bolster year round usage and make them more active. The details of green infrastructure elements like bioswales and permeable surfaces may be visually and technically documented in order to explain how these are used in stormwater management and general well-being of the ecosystem. Finally, though the movable furniture supports flexibility, a well planned combination of the anchored, as well as mobile seating, particularly in places that are windy or have the greatest traffic, would be the right combination of user comfort, durability, and low maintenance. Incorporating such improvements would turn the project into an exemplary model of a sustainable and inclusive campus design and a commendable academic vision.