The design includes the following in order to conserve and protect the heritage while exhibiting it
archeological research for future preservation and information
These initiatives will be taken through LIDAR and no trench technology in order to reduce damage to the site. furthermore, an archeological and exhibition center will be proposed in the bare land for research purposes and for visitors to gain knowledge on ranmasu uyana while learning archeological works on the garden
revitalization through social activity
a tourism approach to the site, where pathways will be created through the site, weaving through structures, rocks and key points, creating a proper trail for visitors to enjoy the garden.
structures to protect and preserve
The revitalization shall be done through the use of wire mesh structures and light weight gabions to restructure the garden to emphasize key points, through the architecture from the Anuradhapura period. these structures shall protect the existing ruins of ranmasu uyana
PRESERVATION: the maintenance against deterioration will be done through the mesh and light weight gabions surrounding the remaining ruins. Pathways are established to ensure people don’t walk on ruins and archeological facts. Light weight structures allow the design to exist with minimum harm to the site.
RECONSTRUCTION: The reconstruction is done with a new mesh material to show the difference between old and new ruins, and also potential structures
RESTORATION: The Irrigation system will be cleaned and restored as much as possible
REVITALIZATION: The influx of people in and out of the site will ensure its maintenance, spread knowledge and information, revitalizing the site socially
REHABILITATION: The archeological aspect introduced will ensure in rehabilitation of the site, economical viability, upgrading the structures, finding out archeological facts and introducing new technologies
FLORENCE CHARTER
ARTICLE 18: THE GARDEN DESIGNED TO BE WALKED IN, ACCESS TO BE RESTRICTED TO THE EXTENT SO THAT THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE AND CULTURE CAN BE PRESERVED.
DESIGN APPROACH: NATURAL OR ARTIFICIAL PATHWAYS CREATED TO ENSURE NO HUMAN TAMPERING TO RUINS. RUINS ARE ALSO PROTECTED WITH GABION STRUTURES AND MESH
VENICE CHARTER
ARTICLE 09: RESTORATION MUST BE PRECEDED FOLLOWED BY ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC STUDY OF THE MOVEMENT
FLORENCE CHARTER
ARTICLE 15: NO RESTORATION SHALL BE TAKEN WITHOUT PRIOR RESEARCH
DESIGN APPROACH: ARCHEOLOGICAL RESEARCH CARRIED OUT AND ANALYSED IN THE PROPOSED CENTRE CAN IN TIME PROVIDE CONCLUSIVE RESULTS AS TO WHAT STOOD
BURRA CHARTER
15.2: CHANGES WHICH REDUCE CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE SHOULD BE REVERSIBLE
18.0: RESTORATION AND RECONSTRUCTION SHOULD REVEAL CULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT ASPECTS OF THE PLACE
20.1: RECONSTRUCTION IS APPROPRIATE WHERE A PLACE IS INCOMPLETE, DAMAGED OR ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO REPRODUCE
20.2 RECONSTRUCTION SHOULD BE IDENTIFIABLE
DESIGN APPROACH: RECONSTRUCTION IS DONE IN OCCASIONS WHERE RESEARCH DONE ABOUT ANURADHAPURA ARCHITECTURE PROVIDES SUFFICENT RECONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DONE WITH A LIGHT WEIGHT MESH, WHICH CAN BE ALTERED OR REMOVED.
florence charter
article 02: gardens are primarily vegetation therefore the appearance is the balance of the seasons
article 09: the authenticity of the garden depends on the design, scale annd the choice of organic material
article 12: species of trees should be selected with regards for the establishment and botanical region
article 14: any alterations which endanger the ecological equilibrium must be prohibited
DESIGN APPROACH: THE MESH AND GABIONS WILL CATER TO GREENERY AND VINES WHICH WILL GROW AND CHANGE DURING THE SEASONS TO CREATE LIFE IN ORGANIC FORM
VENICE CHARTER
ARTICLE 12: REPLACEMENT OF MISSINGPARTS MUST INTERGRATE HARMONIOUSLY WITH THE WHOLE,BUT AT THE SAME TIME SHOULD BE DISTINGUISHABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL
ARTICLE 13: ADDITIONS ALLOWEDSHOULD BE IN BALANCE OF ITS COMPOSITIONAND IN RELATION WITH ITS SURROUNDING
ARTICLE 15: RUINS MUST BE MAINTAINED AND MEASURED FOR CONSERVATION AND THE REASSEMBLING MATERIAL USED SHOULD BE RECOGNIZABLE
DESIGN APPROACH: THE USE OF MESH AS A MATERIAL IS FOR ITS TRANSLUCENCY AND LIGHT WEIGHT. IT CONTRASTS TO THE CURRENT MATERIAL IN THE RUINS. THE COMPOSITION OF THE RESTORATIONS HAVE BEEN STUDIED FROM ANURADHAPURA ARCHITECTURE IN SIMILLAR ERAS
BURRA CHARTER
28.1: DISTURBANCE OF FABRIC FOR STUDY SHOULD BE MINIMISED INCLUDING FOR ARCHEOLOGICAL EXCAVATION, ONLY TO BE TAKEN TO PROVIDE ESSENTIAL DATA FOR CONSERVATION
DESIGN APPROACH: THE RUINS ARE EXPLORED FOR ARCHEOLOGICAL PURPOSES THROUGH NO TRENCH TECHNOLOGY AND LIDAR TECHNOLOFY WHERE THERE IS NO EXCAVATION AND DAMAGE TO THE SITE AND RUINS