Emil Alexiev
student
New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria
Bulgaria
Urban Design and Landscape
CONCEPT AND CONCEPTUAL PROJECT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HISTORICAL MUSEUM IN THE CENTRAL CITY PART OF SVILLENDRAD Object: SVILENGRAD HISTORICAL MUSEUM 26 … more
Muzamil Mutalib
advisor
City University Malaysia
Malaysia
Lecturer specializing in Interior Design and Architecture, with a strong passion for blending… more
The conceptual design for the Svilengrad Historical Museum is a rich and commendable response to both place and purpose. As a jury, we find the integration of architectural clarity with cultural depth to be particularly successful. Rooted in the layered urban and historical fabric of Svilengrad adjacent to landmarks like the Roman “Via Diagonalis” and the 500 year old pedestrian bridge the project succeeds in shaping not only a museum but a civic landmark that embodies history while projecting into the future. The thoughtful selection of the site in the central city zone surrounded by libraries, parks and historical buildings
reveals a strong urban sensitivity. The museum becomes a pivot, not an isolated object. The approach to pedestrian and bicycle connectivity is excellent, reinforcing the museum’s accessibility and its identity as a democratic cultural space. The spatial gestures, such as the open courtyard and the alignment with pedestrian flows, cultivate interaction and offer intuitive wayfinding within the precinct. These elements are not only spatially effective but conceptually vital making the museum an extension of the public realm rather than a retreat from it.
Technically, the scheme is clear, organized, and sustainable. The design reflects a nuanced understanding of climatic and ecological concerns. The reduction of car presence within the immediate site aligns with modern urban ethics, and the inclusion of bicycle infrastructure and universal accessibility demonstrates the project's inclusive ambitions. The circulation and zoning plans reveal rational sequencing and allow for flexibility in programming, from exhibitions and educational events to informal gatherings in green zones.
One of the most impactful aspects of the proposal is its landscape strategy. The reinterpretation of the park area with symbolic features such as the Byzantine cross and lapidarium adds layers of historical narrative while shaping serene yet meaningful public zones. The articulation of these outdoor areas with the museum’s built form enriches the experience of discovery and learning, connecting people with place and memory through spatial storytelling. Architecturally, the museum is disciplined and expressive. The clarity of its layout, the central courtyard as an orienting void and the façade treatment all reflect a pursuit of modern elegance while remaining contextually grounded. The project understands its role not only as a container of exhibits but as a living framework for ongoing cultural dialogue.
In summary, this design embodies the mission of a modern museum is to preserve, to educate and to inspire. It is a project of civic generosity, technical intelligence and symbolic depth, making it a model proposal for how contemporary architecture can respectfully and boldly enhance the urban and historical continuum.