Anastasia Kukarkina, Ilya Dikalchuk
student
Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building
Russian Federation
Urban Design and Landscape
Данный проект был разработан специально для жителей, проживающих в городе Томске по адресу улица Иркутский тракт, дом 26, а также домов поблизости. Жильцы… more
Muzamil Mutalib
advisor
City University Malaysia
Malaysia
Lecturer specializing in Interior Design and Architecture, with a strong passion for blending… more
This project stands as a commendable example of community engaged design, transforming a modest urban courtyard into a vibrant and multifunctional space for all generations. What is most impressive is how the proposal is deeply rooted in social understanding guided not solely by aesthetics or planning conventions but shaped by the voices of the very people it serves. This is the true strength of architecture, its capacity to listen, to adapt and to reflect the lived needs of its users. The project effectively integrates multiple layers of activity within a compact space. Its division into five distinct yet harmoniously connected zones a skate park, children’s playground, quiet resting area, walking alley and dog walking space demonstrates a thoughtful response to the diverse patterns of use identified through direct community feedback. This human-centered approach is not only appropriate but essential in a time where many urban spaces risk alienating users through generic or one-size-fits-all solutions.
From a design standpoint, the layout shows spatial clarity and ease of navigation. The circulation is intuitive, with zones arranged to accommodate both dynamic activity and serene respite. Placing the skate park as the central and largest zone reflects the demographic survey findings and speaks to the importance of data driven planning in architectural solutions. Additionally, the adjacency between the children's playground and the quiet zone was a smart move, allowing for guardianship and social interaction without spatial conflict.
Technically, the inclusion of simple, modular elements that residents and volunteers can assemble themselves is both economically wise and socially empowering. This not only reduces cost but fosters a sense of ownership and pride among the users a hallmark of resilient community spaces. The choice to use local and participatory construction methods also aligns with sustainable development principles and reinforces the spirit of collaboration. Visually, the proposal uses strong contrast in diagrams and visualizations to clearly communicate intent. The plan at 1:200 and the situational scheme both clearly articulate the integration of the site within the broader urban fabric, while the rendered views help bring the user experience to life. The silhouetted figures cleverly highlight age diversity and usage scenarios without over-complicating the presentation.
In conclusion, this is a well-researched, emotionally intelligent and technically grounded project. It is a testament to how architecture can genuinely enhance daily life when it engages its audience not just as users but as co-creators. The students behind this design have demonstrated maturity beyond their academic standing, proposing not merely a yard renovation but a catalyst for community connection and urban renewal.