ahamed dhilzath
student
University of Moratuwa (UoM), Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Moratuwa
Sri Lanka
Architecture
Serving the Underserved (A Building for Fishing Community) Design Statement In the face of rapid urbanization and tourism-driven development, traditional… more
Matěj Bálek
advisor
VSB - Technical university of Ostrava
Czech Republic
Navrhujeme udržitelnou organickou architekturu. Zabýváme se návrhy občanských staveb, ale i… more
I was very impressed by the overall concept of the project, as it aims to create a social space for the entire community and involves locals in both the design and construction phases. A fundamental principle of good architecture is that it serves people well. I also appreciate the focus on ecology and the use of recycled materials from previous structures. These days, the trend is often to build everything anew using new materials—while that’s understandable, whenever there’s an opportunity to reuse materials, that should be taken into account.
Every design should begin with a thorough investigation of the site and an understanding of its genius loci. Conversations with local residents help ground the design concept in reality, which I find essential. Architecture should not only enhance the space it occupies but also push technological boundaries and create new jobs—not only during construction. Involving local craftsmen fosters a sense of belonging and makes the project more readily accepted by the community. People gain insight into the process and connect with the outcome. A building is not just an isolated object, but a small part of the broader picture of its locality. Likewise, every space should include greenery, which helps shape the overall atmosphere and form the environment.
From an architectural standpoint, the project comprises two distinctly different structures, yet there is a clear effort to fuse modern and traditional aesthetics. On one hand, there is a functionalist-brutalist concrete building, whose clean lines emphasize its form. On the other hand, a lightweight steel structure combined with wood and concrete acknowledges tradition. Such a blend of new and old brings complexities—both functional and aesthetic. New construction methods and technologies tend to age faster than traditional architecture, which may havestood the test of time for centuries. The more contrasting a building is, the greater the risk of rapid aging. The skeletal structural system allows for flexible interior layouts and creates an airy, light-filled space suitable for both work and relaxation. Conversely, the massive concrete building provides a sturdy, comfortable interior climate. If designed too compactly, however, its proportions may feel claustrophobic. In large public spaces with extensive roofs and paving, it’s important to manage rainwater effectively. While the fish market’s roof handles this well, I could not find information in the project about what happens to the excess water. I’m impressed by the permeable stone surfaces, where rainwater percolates directly into the ground—this seems like the best solution. The overall layout of buildings and outdoor public space seems well conceived. However, I would advise against placing storage rooms right by the water; they would be the first to flood if sea levels rise.
Brutalist concrete structures often struggle with weather exposure—rain, wind, and other elements can be harsh. Therefore, concrete is best used for structural elements, while external surfaces should have protective coatings or be combined with other materials. Though durable, concrete tends to deteriorate faster without such measures. Managing stormwater is also crucial, as prolonged exposure can corrode reinforcement. For seaside constructions, I recommend deeper foundations or pilings—either wooden or concrete—to resist coastal erosion and rising water levels. Each foundation type has its own advantages and drawbacks.
The graphic presentation is very successful—it shows the relationship with the surroundings, which I consider crucial, and it effectively showcases the project. I also appreciate the inclusion of various analyses in the presentation, which convey what the design considered. The renderings are clean, clear, and the color palette harmonizes with the overall design. What’s missing, however, are the floor plans for the seasonal fishermen’s accommodations—they are essential to evaluate the quality and functionality of the housing. I also noticed that three display posters present the same scenario. This repetition feels unnecessary; I would prefer a fourth poster with new content or a different drawing.
The project responds beautifully to its context and reflects the community. The use of natural and recycled materials adds value to the space. Overall, it leaves a very positive impression. My main recommendation would be to avoid repeating drawings in the presentation. From an architectural standpoint, consider better integration of the old and the new. Technically, pay more attention to the foundation and protect the concrete tower from rainwater effects.
Dear Matěj Bálek,
Thank you very much for your thoughtful and detailed feedback on my project. I sincerely appreciate the time and care you took to evaluate it, especially your reflections on the social, ecological, and technical aspects. It is encouraging to know that the community-driven approach and the intention to reuse materials were well received, as these values are central to the project’s concept.
Your emphasis on grounding the design in the site’s genius loci and engaging with local voices aligns closely with my design philosophy. I agree wholeheartedly that architecture must serve people and context, not merely occupy space. I also appreciate your point about the integration of local craftsmen—an aspect I hope to deepen further in future iterations and similar projects.
Regarding your observations on the architectural language and the contrasting forms—thank you for highlighting both the potential and the challenges of blending functionalist concrete with traditional materials. Your remarks about material aging and the importance of long-term resilience are well taken. I will certainly consider how the balance between permanence and flexibility can be more cohesively resolved, especially in contexts where the climatic conditions are as demanding as coastal environments.
Your technical comments on stormwater management, coastal foundations, and material durability are extremely valuable. While the fish market’s roof does address runoff, I recognize that the overall rainwater strategy could be communicated more clearly in the presentation. The suggestion to consider pilings or deeper foundations for erosion resistance is noted, and I plan to explore this more rigorously in future coastal projects.
I also appreciate your remarks on the graphic representation and presentation strategy. Your critique regarding the repetition of images and the missing floor plans for the seasonal housing is constructive. In future submissions, I will ensure that all programmatic components are fully illustrated and that each board contributes uniquely to the narrative.
Overall, I am grateful for your balanced critique, it has affirmed several key intentions of the design while providing concrete directions for improvement. Feedback such as yours not only informs this project but strengthens my broader architectural thinking and practice.
Thank you once again for your guidance and support.
Warm regards,
Dhilzath