Елена Дмитриевна Болтовская
student
Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building
Russian Federation
Architecture
An indoor market with 500 retail spaces. The project site is located in the city of Tomsk, at the intersection of Uchebnaya and Vershinina streets. This area… more
Reza Keshavarznorozpour
advisor
Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch
Iranian
Modern architecture projects in a historic urban environment more
1. Conceptual Clarity and Coherence
Strengths:
The concept of organizing the market by product category into distinct spatial zones is clear and effective. It mirrors traditional market logic while offering a contemporary architectural response.
The circular layout and central atrium reinforce the idea of unity, guiding users intuitively while celebrating the market as a civic space.
Suggestions:
The idea of modular blocks forming a coherent whole is compelling; consider emphasizing this synthesis more visually in the plan layout. The segmentation could benefit from subtle visual transitions or material thresholds that both separate and connect zones.
2. Spatial Organization and Functionality
Strengths:
The radial symmetry with a central atrium allows natural circulation and efficient wayfinding.
The second floor for auxiliary retail and terraces demonstrates good vertical zoning and functional layering.
Potential Weaknesses:
While the segmentation is rational, visitor movement might be constrained if the circulation paths between sections are too narrow or overly compartmentalized.
Ensure service access (loading/unloading, waste management) does not conflict with customer zones. These elements are not shown clearly in the drawings.
Suggestions:
Add secondary circulation rings or lateral paths that interconnect the different product zones for a more fluid user experience.
Clarify logistics and back-of-house operations in section or axonometric views to validate the building’s operational feasibility.
3. Relationship to Context and Site
Strengths:
The project addresses the triangular urban site effectively, orienting entrances toward major pedestrian axes and surrounding streets.
Landscaping buffers the market from the roads and enhances its civic presence.
Suggestions:
Consider how the building interacts with seasonal conditions in Tomsk (e.g., snow accumulation, cold winds). Are covered walkways or vestibules included?
Explore stronger pedestrian integration with the surrounding streetscape — for instance, shaded entry plazas or extended canopy lines leading into the market.
4. Use of Natural Light and Ventilation
Strengths:
The central dome and clerestory glazing provide ample natural light to the atrium, reducing dependence on artificial lighting.
The use of open terraces on the second floor can facilitate cross-ventilation.
Suggestions:
Clarify whether passive ventilation is integrated into the dome structure. Could operable vents at the top of the dome be used for thermal stack ventilation?
Daylighting strategies in the outer zones (under solid roof) could be enhanced with skylights or high windows.
5. Material Selection and Structural Logic
Strengths:
The interplay of concrete, metal, and wood creates a robust yet warm material palette, appropriate for a civic-commercial typology.
Structural expression is clear and elegant, especially the radial dome supported by perimeter columns.
Potential Weaknesses:
Extensive use of concrete might affect thermal comfort unless properly insulated or treated, particularly in a Siberian climate.
Suggestions:
Consider thermal breaks and energy-efficient glazing, especially in the dome, to maintain interior comfort.
Explore more detailing of how wood is used in interiors — is it structural, cladding, or furniture-grade? This could enhance the atmosphere and identity.
6. Human Scale and User Experience
Strengths:
The open terraces and covered colonnades create inviting, pedestrian-friendly spaces.
The circular form fosters a sense of community and social interaction.
Suggestions:
Some interior perspectives feel sparse; consider how signage, kiosks, lighting, and furniture will humanize the space and guide users.
Emphasize accessibility for all users — clear ramps, lifts, and resting spots.
7. Innovation and Sustainability
Strengths:
The radial program layout and dome structure are architecturally bold yet contextually grounded.
Passive lighting and natural ventilation potentials show environmentally responsive design thinking.
Suggestions:
Explore renewable energy integration, such as photovoltaic panels on the dome.
Rainwater harvesting from the large roof surface could be incorporated, especially for landscape irrigation or sanitation use.
Conclusion
This project displays strong conceptual and architectural clarity, with a well-integrated program and striking urban presence. With some refinements in circulation, contextual response, and sustainable detailing, the design could evolve into a landmark civic-commercial hub for Tomsk.
.........................................................................................