Kelvin Lee Kian Shie
student
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Malaysia
Architecture
The center’s primary objective is to create a robust sense of place where fragmented urban elements are reconciled, and the community is drawn back into a… more
Stefan Stanković
advisor
GAF - University of Niš - Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture
Serbian
To create sustainable space for a future generation more
This project really caught my attention with how well it balances massing, function, and urban integration. The stepped blocks aren’t just a visual move—they open up the site, create breathing space, and smartly guide pedestrian flow. It’s clear that the site strategy was well thought out, especially the way the buildings respond to the terrain and surrounding context.
What I really like:
Site Planning:
The site plan works. Circulation is clear, the hierarchy of spaces makes sense, and there’s a solid relationship between built form and green space. The layout doesn’t feel forced—it flows naturally, and that’s not easy to pull off in a dense mixed-use setup.
Architecture & Massing:
The sloped rooflines and transparent facades give the buildings a strong identity, but they also support passive design strategies. The terraced levels suggest good light and ventilation control, which is always a big plus in real projects.
Public to Private Transition:
One of the strongest aspects is how the project handles public, semi-public, and private zones. You can tell the intention was to make the entire complex feel open, social, and livable. The shared spaces are actually designed to be used, not just shown in diagrams.
Visuals & Presentation:
The drawings are clean, easy to read, and the story behind the design is clear. Diagrams walk you through the process, and the perspectives help you feel the space—which is rare in student or concept-level work.
Material & Detail Layer:
I’d love to see more on materials—what’s the building skin made of? How does it perform over time? Those details would make the design feel more real and grounded.
Program Life Cycle:
The mixed-use program works on paper, but I’d push a bit more into how it functions over time. Who uses what space, and when? Does the layout support that rhythm?
Environmental Strategy:
The design clearly hints at sustainability, but a few diagrams on systems (solar, rainwater, ventilation) would help tie it all together and give it an even stronger position.
Overall:
Super solid work. This is the kind of project that’s not just about looking good—it actually seems like it could function in real life. There’s a clear understanding of urban logic, human scale, and how to build a community, not just buildings. Respect for that.