Gabriela Beinhauerová
student
FAST VUT - Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Department of Architecture
Czech Republic
Architecture
The theme of the studio work is to create an architectural study of the restoration of the Medov Farmstead, including a proposal for the new use of the former… more
Yixuan Liu
advisor
University of California, Berkeley
United States of America
Yixuan Liu has led multiple high-profile architectural projects from concept through construction,… more
One of the strongest aspects of this project is the designer’s respect for the historic site. It’s clear that throughout the restoration and adaptive reuse process, the designer approached the historical building with great care: the continuity of the façade and materials preserves the building’s original character. This kind of thoughtful, responsible approach is essential and definitely one of the project’s biggest strengths.
However, respecting history doesn’t just mean “using the same materials and replicating old details.” At the moment, its strategy still feels limited to “protection equals restoration of appearances.” In reality, the deeper value of heritage preservation lies in creating a dialogue between the past and the present, allowing people to experience a sense of historical continuity through the spaces they use. If it could push further in terms of spatial design, material expression, and functional activation by creating more tension and dialogue between past and present. I believer this project would be more compelling and would better demonstrate the designer’s deep understanding of heritage.
Here are a few commonly used approaches that could be considered for this project:
Spatial experience: Currently, the manner of layout or organization of courtyard and learning spaces focuses much more on functional needs and less on layering or narrative. Initiating another look at the spatial arrangement and circulation could allow more meaningful relationships for the new interventions with the historic fabric. One example would be having the new functional areas be "time slices", allowing the user to feel the intersection of past and present while augmenting the depth, layering, and storytelling of the space.
Materials and craftsmanship: Currently, the premise is leaning towards replicating the original materials and details. A more compelling approach could involve installing contemporary materials and craft techniques that remain unwaveringly in contrast with the historic fabric. This level of dialogue could, in fact, emphasize the value of the heritage rather than diminish it, while also preventing the "faux-old" aesthetic.
Activation through function: Concerning heritage, it is not just about the aesthetic it is also about the societal significance. By introducing additional public programs, exhibitions, or community functions, the building could become more of a true contributor to the life of the city. And, consequently, to the legacy of the historic site.