Tihon Belskih
student
Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography
Russian Federation
Architecture
The problem is to locate the pavilion on Cherkizovsky Pond, which is located in Moscow, the exhibition pavilion of the history of the Russian Navy, within the… more
Esmaeil GHASEMZADEH
advisor
Islamic Republic of Iran
My architecture begins in silence — in listening to the ground before drawing a line.I do not seek… more
This project presents a strong and coherent architectural statement, grounded in a clear conceptual narrative. The idea of translating the character of a naval vessel—its strength, directionality, and structural rhythm—into architectural form is convincingly executed. The geometry, roof articulation, and repetitive structural frames consistently reinforce the maritime concept rather than functioning as a purely formal gesture.
The relationship between the pavilion and the water is one of the project’s most successful aspects. By positioning the building as a linear edge along the pond, the design establishes a meaningful dialogue between architecture and landscape. The pavilion operates as an interface between land and water, allowing visitors to engage with the site even without entering the enclosed exhibition spaces. This approach demonstrates a mature understanding of public architecture and accessibility.
Spatial organization is logical and readable. The sequence from entrance to main exhibition and outdoor display is clear, and the sectional design suggests thoughtful consideration of light, movement, and visual continuity. However, in certain areas the architectural form dominates the human scale. Introducing more defined transitional spaces, pauses, and moments of compression and release could significantly enhance the experiential quality of the interior journey.
From a material and structural perspective, the use of reinforced concrete aligns well with the project’s conceptual emphasis on durability and permanence. Nevertheless, the proposal would benefit from greater attention to architectural detail at the human level—particularly at entrances, edges, and points of contact—to strengthen the tactile and spatial experience.
Overall, this is a well-resolved and conceptually driven student project with a clear identity and strong competition potential. With further refinement of human-scale elements and experiential depth, the project could reach a higher level of architectural maturity.
My advice is to focus on strengthening the human-scale experience and architectural detailing of the project. While the overall concept and form are clear and expressive, the pavilion would benefit from a more articulated main entrance and clearer transitional spaces between interior and exterior zones. Introducing areas for pause, observation, and informal gathering—especially along the waterfront—would enhance visitor engagement and spatial richness. In addition, refining material transitions and detailing at eye level could help translate the strong conceptual idea into a more tactile and immersive architectural experience.
17.12.2025