Omar Harb

advisor

USEK - Holy spirit University of Kaslik

Lebanon

As an architect and founder of Omar Harb Architects & Associates, my work centers on creating… more

This project by Barbora Oborná is a well-considered design for a nursery in a village setting. Its strength lies in its clear programmatic organization, thoughtful response to the surrounding architectural context, and a meticulous approach to a specific architectural detail. The project successfully balances the needs of children with those of the wider community.

Strengths:

Thoughtful Programmatic Division: The separation of the main community building (with the sauna and multi-purpose hall) from the children's classrooms is a wise decision. This allows the building to serve dual, and at times conflicting, functions without compromising either. It provides a public hub for the village while maintaining a safe and distinct environment for the nursery.

Contextual and Atypical Architectural Language: The design cleverly integrates traditional forms (the community building's gabled roof) with a more contemporary expression. The use of a "monotonous crust" of metal roofing and siding is a bold and striking interpretation of a vernacular archetype, while the prominent wooden gable highlights its public function. In contrast, the nursery's simple stucco and flat roof provide a quiet, child-friendly backdrop. This formal distinction effectively communicates the different functions of the two buildings.

Exceptional Detail-Oriented Design: The 1:1 physical model of the integrated bench is a testament to the project's rigor and attention to detail. This is a key strength. The bench's design is highly functional, aesthetically pleasing, and shows a deep understanding of user needs (both adults and children), material behavior, and construction logic. The use of playful, colorful seats and the incorporation of safety features showcase a human-centered design approach.

Comprehensive Technical and Material Selection: The project details a solid and logical construction system, from the reinforced concrete foundations to the use of sand-lime blocks, prestressed ceiling panels, and timber for the roof. The material choices, like fibre cement boards for the facade and wood-aluminum windows with triple glazing, indicate a focus on durability, energy efficiency, and low maintenance.

While the project is robust in its concept and execution, a few areas could be further developed to elevate its overall impact and narrative.

1. Strengthen the Connection Between the Two Buildings

Suggestion: The two buildings are described as being distinct, with a communal courtyard between them.

Improvement: While the formal distinction is a strength, the project could benefit from a clearer visual or material language that unifies the two masses. For example, does the material of the integrated bench on the main building reappear in some form on the nursery building? Is the landscaping or paving of the courtyard a design element that stitches the two parts together? Highlighting a shared detail or a continuous design thread would strengthen the idea of a cohesive campus, not just two separate buildings.

2. Elaborate on the "Dynamic Lines" and Triangular Elements

Suggestion: The bench detail description mentions "dynamic lines" and "triangular elements" that follow the facade.

Improvement: This is a fantastic detail, but it needs to be shown more clearly in relation to the main building's facade design. The main building is described as a "solid and monotonous crust." How do the dynamic lines of the bench interact with this static, monochromatic surface? A detailed drawing or rendering that shows the bench seamlessly emerging from or contrasting with the facade would provide a clearer understanding of this design gesture.

3. Provide More Context for the "Vegetated Roof"

Suggestion: The nursery building has a "flat vegetated roof," which is a sustainable feature.

Improvement: Explain the specific benefits and design of this roof in more detail. Does it serve a specific ecological function beyond just "green coverage," such as rainwater management or biodiversity enhancement? Is it an extensive green roof with sedum, or an intensive one that could serve as a teaching garden for the children? Linking this feature to the nursery's curriculum or a broader environmental strategy would add significant value.

4. Clarify the Parking and Outdoor Space Integration

Suggestion: The project mentions sufficient parking and an outdoor space.

Improvement: Show how the parking area is integrated into the site's design to minimize its visual and environmental impact. Is it hidden or partially vegetated? Also, provide more detail on the children's outdoor space. Is it a generic playground, or are there specific zones for different age groups or activities? Does the design of the outdoor space, perhaps with specific play equipment or landscaping, also draw from the village's local culture or natural environment?