Omar Harb

advisor

USEK - Holy spirit University of Kaslik

Lebanon

As an architect and founder of Omar Harb Architects & Associates, my work centers on creating… more

This project by Jakub Černík presents a well-structured and conceptually clear design for a complex that is both site-specific and environmentally conscious. The strength of the proposal lies in its cohesive design language, which is directly inspired by a unique local feature, and its comprehensive approach to sustainability and functionality.

Strengths:

Powerful Conceptual Framework: The use of a dinosaur spine as the central design axis is a highly effective and memorable concept. It provides an organic logic for the entire site plan, guiding visitor movement and establishing a unique identity that is deeply tied to the location's paleontological significance.

Integrated Functionality: The design demonstrates a clear understanding of the user experience. The various functions—laboratories, a café, exhibition spaces, and accommodation—are strategically placed to create a logical and engaging flow. The central placement of the accommodation building acts as a natural hub, reinforcing the "spine" concept.

Strong Sustainable and Technical Approach: The project's commitment to sustainability is well-articulated. The use of earth berms for stable interior environments, the strategic placement of photovoltaic panels, and the incorporation of heat recovery and timber panels showcase a thoughtful, holistic approach to energy efficiency and carbon footprint reduction. The claim of up to a 60% reduction in CO₂ emissions is a significant and impressive metric.

Contextual and Functional Facade Design: The facade is not merely decorative; it is a direct response to solar orientation. The combination of glass, shading louvers, and compact windows on the north side shows a practical application of passive design principles, ensuring daylight and thermal comfort while maintaining a simple and functional aesthetic.

While the project is very strong, a few areas could be further developed to enhance the proposal's depth and clarity.

1. More Explicit Visual and Spatial Connection to the "Spine"

Suggestion: The description states that the central axis references a dinosaur's spine, but this is a high-level conceptual idea.

Improvement: Show how the architectural form itself and the internal spaces more directly echo this idea. Does the accommodation building, as the "main structure," have a segmented or vertebral-like form? Are the footbridges and paths designed with a curve or rhythm that explicitly recalls the spine's structure? A series of diagrams showing a dinosaur skeleton overlayed with the site plan would make this connection visually undeniable.

2. Elaborate on the "Prototype Houses" Exhibition Space

Suggestion: The project mentions an exhibition space for "prototype houses," but this is a very brief mention.

Improvement: Clarify the purpose and design of this space. Is it an indoor gallery, or are the prototypes actual, full-scale outdoor models that visitors can walk through? This feature could be a major highlight of the complex. Explaining how this exhibition space integrates with the overall design and contributes to the site's educational and cultural mission would strengthen the project's narrative.

3. Provide More Detail on Visitor Flow and Accessibility

Suggestion: The description outlines visitor entry points from the west and south, but the experience could be described in more detail.

Improvement: Walk the reader through a more detailed sequence of the visitor's journey. For example, what is the experience of the path "toward the central area"? How is the transition from the parking structure to the information center handled? A simple diagram or annotated site plan with numbered paths and points of interest could make the circulation logic clearer and more compelling.

4. Enhance the Narrative on Materiality and Aesthetics

Suggestion: The technical information mentions timber panels and a simple, functional expression, but the aesthetic vision could be further developed.

Improvement: While simplicity is a virtue, adding a brief description of the intended aesthetic would be beneficial. Do the timber panels create a warm, natural contrast to the glass and metal? Do they evoke the texture of bone or fossilized wood, further tying into the dinosaur concept? Connecting the material choices to the core idea and the surrounding landscape would enrich the project's visual and conceptual narrative.