Most developing countries in Asia are going through a rapid urbanisation, and few cities illustrate the tension between dense population and strained infrastructure more vividly than Dhaka, situated at the junction of three tectonic plates. Established four centuries ago as the Mughal eastern province’s capital, Dhaka’s historic core—Old Dhaka—retains a rich cultural tapestry embedded within one of the world’s most densely built urban fabrics. This treasured heritage coexists uneasily with the city’s current explosive growth: unplanned urbanisation, inadequate enforcement of building regulations, and minimal open space have conspired to place Dhaka among the world’s top twenty earthquake-vulnerable cities. A study warns that a 6.9-magnitude quake along the Madhupur Fault could destroy over 850,000 buildings in Dhaka, killing and injuring over 400,000. The city's recent tremors serve as a stark reminder of the looming threat.
Frequent fire incidents in mixed-use buildings and the developed cracks of ageing structures only heighten this vulnerability. In the aftermath of a major catastrophe, many homes could become uninhabitable, leaving residents exposed to injury, disease, and prolonged displacement. This reality highlights the urgent need for a systematic, post-disaster urban preparedness strategy—one that includes context-sensitive models of transitional sheltering, designed to ensure rapid recovery and safeguard the well-being of affected communities.

Rationale and Objectives:
Dhaka’s urban planning authority recommends using undamaged public schools as emergency and recreational spaces as temporary sheltering sites after disasters. However, these directives lack specificity regarding spatial layouts, materials, orientation, and water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities. Recognising this gap, this project proposes a comprehensive temporary and transitional sheltering (T‑sheltering) system designed for Old Dhaka’s open fields. The objectives are—
• Provide rapid-life-saving interventions and thoughtfully designed shelters addressing the local climate, with emergency healthcare and WASH facilities to stabilise affected populations, following humanitarian standards.
• Accelerate physical and psychosocial recovery by including not only healthcare facilities, but also therapeutic social spaces for the community’s well-being, maintaining the traditional public-to-private hierarchy.
• Enable sites to swiftly revert to original recreational use once the sheltering period ends (maximum two years), preventing permanent encroachment.
• Establish a replicable research framework, adaptable to other high-density urban areas worldwide.

Methodology:
To operationalise the proposed strategy, the following methodology was adopted and applied to a representative site in Old Dhaka, with a mixed-methods research approach. National and international humanitarian standards and guidelines (UNHCR Shelter Solutions, Sphere Handbook) were examined to ensure compliance with health, sanitation, WASH, and safety protocols.
Following field visits and vulnerability assessments, Sutrapur and Gendaria Thana (population density ≈ 101,500 persons/km² and 97,000 persons/km², respectively) of Old Dhaka were chosen as case communities. Observations highlighted not only the risk factors—substandard construction, narrow alleys, and limited emergency access—but also the latent potential of the Dhupkhola field to be a sheltering site. Its size, road connectivity, existing RCC entry pavilions, and proximity to utilities render it ideal for rapid shelter deployment with minimal infrastructural interventions. Therefore, Dhupkhola Field at Gendaria was chosen as a case site to shelter disaster survivors from Sutrapur and Gendaria.
To understand the sociocultural context, a questionnaire survey was conducted with over fifty locals to gather data on communal values, income, whether they have alternative places to live, and recovery priorities. Market surveys in nearby locations were conducted to identify readily available modular materials. Site documentation combined GIS mapping with precise on-site measurements of Dhupkhola Field, adjacent building footprints, and utility lines.

Shelter Design Strategy:
According to international handbooks, a 1:3 site-to-shelter footprint ratio (33% of site) is recommended, with at least 50% open space and up to 20–25% for roads. It allows a maximum 1:2 ratio when toilets and kitchens are attached to each shelter. The proposed transitional shelter and its service units occupy 40% of Dhupkhola’s four-acre field, seamlessly integrating modular living units, essential services, and therapeutic landscapes into a resilient community designed for up to two years.
Inspired by Old Dhaka’s spatial vocabulary—Angina (small private courtyard for women), Uthan/Rowak (front yard), Gali (lane), and Morh (corner node)—the layout embeds familiar social spaces into its design hierarchy. Each household unit accommodates up to 2 adults and 1–2 children. Comprising up to five shelter units (10 adults and 5–10 children), they share a semi-private porch (Rowak), which seamlessly transitions into an intimate courtyard, hidden from the front. This small courtyard can be used for drying clothes, personal gardening, or even dining together. Narrow, soft-paved pathways (Gali) link these semi-private spaces to service blocks and community nodes, evoking Old Dhaka’s sociable alleyways, where daily movement fosters interaction, vital to collective recovery for these trauma-impacted communities.
Next, four shelters form a larger cluster or a community module for 40 adults and 20–40 children, with a common kitchen and lavatory. WASH facilities comply with UNHCR standards yet respect local customs, incorporating wudu sinks and cloth-washing platforms that also function as unenclosed shower spaces. This allows for fewer enclosed bathrooms, as the male relatives of Old Dhaka are familiar with showering together in the open before heading to work.
Two or four such community modules enclose a central courtyard around their shared kitchens. Old Dhaka’s communities are usually conservative; most women stay home most of the time, cook and socialise with neighbouring women inside the building, often on the rooftop while maintaining a garden, while men work outside. Therefore, grouping the shared kitchens centring on a larger court allows them to not only socialise while working, but also supervise their children playing in the court. As women and children are often more vulnerable during disasters and face barriers to accessing aid, their safety and well-being remain a design priority. There are shaded seating alcoves nestled among garden pockets, promoting mental well-being, offering residents a sense of normalcy and calm.

This conceptual project presents a holistic, research-driven model for transitional shelter in high-density urban contexts. By converging algorithmic design, modular fabrication, community-based processes, and sustainable practices, the project bridges immediate humanitarian relief with enduring community resilience and recovery. Rooted in Dhaka’s historic fabric, this framework embeds modular, community-centric shelter strategies within the urban core, offering a replicable module, not only the shelter unit itself, but the whole design strategy and research methodology, that provides vital insights for post-disaster recovery planning in similarly dense cities worldwide—particularly those in the Global South.

Fabrication and Environmental Considerations:
To minimise environmental footprint, the design prioritises locally abundant, low-carbon materials. Structural frames consist of paired Class D Schedule-80 uPVC pipes (60mm diameter), clamped together to resist buckling. Flooring comprises fibre-cement boards, chosen for durability and moisture resistance. Locally woven bamboo mats function as vents, doors, and window covers. Recently developed Jutin (corrugated jute-composite sheets) utilising the indigenous jute is chosen as wall and roof panels. All the materials were chosen for their lightweight, reusable, recyclable, and climatic properties. Metal wires fastened to the roof panel anchor it to the ground, running through the corner pipes. Efficient use of interior space is emphasised to avoid wastage, and sliding window panels attached to the units use minimal clearance, not hindering circulation. Instead of deploying separate shelter units, the design combines groups of 4–6 units (average five) around a shared semi-private foyer or porch, forming an integrated shelter cluster, eliminating individual entry ramps and staircases for each unit to cut the footprint. In addition, adjacent units further reduce resource use by sharing structural walls. Pairing two shelters accommodates larger families without sacrificing space efficiency.
Every shelter cluster, kitchen, and sanitation block integrates rainwater harvesting tanks and greywater reuse channels. Collected water supports vertical gardens on kitchen façades, bolstering food security and microclimate regulation. Passive design measures were considered—cross-ventilation, use of eco-cooler modules, elongation of clusters towards east–west with services at east and west to reduce afternoon heat exposure while maximising airflow from the south.

Algorithmic Clustering:
A generative design algorithm is used with several international shelter-planning standards as parameters to visualise multiple forms of community to choose the best possible solution for the case site in terms of circulation distance to services from shelters, courtyards’ privacy, cross-ventilation, etc.

Phased Implementation:
• Pre-Disaster Preparedness: Before any crisis, critical infrastructure is pre-installed, such as gates and ramps for emergency vehicular access in the field, tubewells, and spaces for material storage.
• Emergency Phases: Immediately post-disaster, emergency medical tents (placed on the pavilion floor if structurally sound, otherwise adjacent clearings) are erected. A 16-ft-wide space for the central axis road bisects the field into four blocks, acting as both a logistical corridor and a communal spine. Each block is divided into 3-ft×3-ft grids. A multipurpose uPVC pipe-and-tarpaulin hall is installed at the centre of the field to coordinate relief operations and community assemblies.
• Next, the planned settlement area is marked while WASH facilities are installed. Temporary tents accommodate early arrivals.
• Block-Allocation Phase: As soon as the modular materials for transitional shelters arrive on site, the communities and volunteers install them using simple mechanical tools.
• Recovery Phase: When all the other facilities are supplied, shared kitchens and storage and administrative offices will be installed, following other facilities such as gardening to enhance the recovery. Multipurpose halls can be disassembled and repurposed for workshops and cultural events, reinforcing social cohesion.
• Reversion & Reuse: The users can move to a permanent location after repairing their houses or getting a solution from the government; the site will be reverted to being a football playground, and the materials will be reused.